Aesthetics
and the Middle School Learner
I
found this article last summer while researching Middle School Identity. It is one that I think of often, as I
feel it applies to my goal as an art educator. The article starts with two simple questions: “What is
beautiful to a Middle Schooler? How often are middle schoolers asked to think
about what they find beautiful and why?”
Aesthetics is defined as “The study and appreciation of beauty.” The article argues, “Recognizing and
creating beauty are critical to achieving the full potential of an adult mind
and spirit.” The art educator’s
responsibility is to “make obvious the underlying elements of what is beautiful”
and “help students explore their ability to create beauty themselves. This is especially important for those
students who come to school with little exposure to beauty.” This makes me think of my Intro to Art
for non-majors course, as most of the students haven’t been in an art class
since elementary school. They
haven’t been asked to think about aesthetics or what they find beautiful in
years (if ever).
The
article references John Dewey and his progressive education philosophy, in
which an art educator is an artist who facilitates the development of the child
as artist. “Dewey defined the eternal
quality of great art as its capacity for further defining experiences… Dewey
believed that no intellectual activity is complete without aesthetic quality.”
Read,
one of Dewey’s followers in the field of humanist education, “argues that the
general purpose of education is to foster the growth of the individual while
harmonizing the individual with his or her social group.” Furthermore, “Educators such as Broudy
assert that the use of the arts to teach other disciplines results in lessons
that are more concrete, motivating, and engaging. Thus, Broudy argues, aesthetic lessons foster higher
academic achievement. It is this
integrative approach to aesthetics that has the most potential for reaching all
students.”
Seeing
as aesthetic education today often takes the form of “encore” or “elective,” it
is entirely possible for students to leave elementary school and never be
exposed to any study of the visual arts again. “Even in today’s art and music curriculum there appears to
be less emphasis on aesthetic study and more on technical skills.” I have found this to be true in regards
to the syllabus I am to outline in my Intro Class for the University. It is divided into units based on the
elements of art and principles of organization, without any discussion of
content or concept. It has been a
challenge to transform each unit into something more in depth and investigative
for each student, while having to teach one individual technique at a
time.
The
study of beauty should be an integrated across subjects. “Rarely do history, mathematics, and
science become vehicles for the study of beauty. Yet science and aesthetics are not divorced.” As an educator, tt is important to ask:
“How can knowledge of content enrich and complement the beauty inherent in each
subject?” Furthermore, How can
middle school learners, or any learner, “Be surrounded by beauty so that it
becomes part of the schema of a rich adult life?”
Topic
Proposal:
I
would like to investigate an approach to designing curriculum for an intro to
art class for non-majors at a university.
I hope to propose a syllabus with creative and dynamic investigations,
leading to visually literate and culturally aware graduates exposed to creative
productivity.
The result and culmination of my
investigation will be in the form of a zine. I am choosing to create a zine because it is important that
the form follow the function, in a way. It makes sense that my presentation of teaching art is in itself an artwork.
I remember the first time I was introduced to the writings of John Dewey and I thought,
ReplyDelete"Yay, I can relate to this man and I like the way he thinks!"
I can also relate to your article and I am both envious and excited for you and your teaching endeavors at MU.
I look forward to your artistically presented curriculum!